- Joined
- Jan 29, 2019
- Messages
- 51,939
I donāt see why it needs to be either or? We donāt have the players for expansive football without picking up results like Plymouth, but at the same time are squad is better than the crap weāve served up all year. We barely score any goals yet ship them like nobodies business1 point off the playoffs, 3 points off 5th š
Only jesting, but it is a fact, for those who like facts.
I asked a question the other day: would fans prefer it if we played expansive, easy on the eye, attacking football like Plymouth and were 7 points worse off and 9 places further down the league?
I'm guessing you might say you will be OK with it, since league position isn't that important to you? (by the same token, I assume it doesn't matter where we finish in the league?)
It's a genuine question, not being belligerent.
Iām easily pleased, Iām happy with seeing a recognisable style of play and clear tactical preparation - thatās why I enjoyed Neilās first two years. We didnāt play expansive football, we were super aggressive in the press and a lethal counter attacking team, which was why we were capable of beating anyone on our day. I cannot see a single element of tactical preparation or coached style of play under Lowe, and havenāt for over 12 months.
And yeah, Iād rather finish 15th and look back over the season at a number of games where Iāve enjoyed the performance, weāve scored 3 or 4 goals and battered a team, than finish 8th after a year of boring game after boring game with exclusively 1 goal victories and multiple thrashing. But maybe I have different interests when it comes to football than others