Skip to main content

Bye bye 32Red?

Bye bye 32Red?

Regardless said:
Really?
Click to expand...
Yes, really.

Seems to me it would be more principled and ethical to drop the sponsor with zero self-serving fanfare.

Likewise, when you say we "need to be the first club to do it though", I would say being e.g. the second club to do it (or third, or fourth...) would be no less principled or ethical.
 
Thracia said:
Yes, really.

Seems to me it would be more principled and ethical to drop the sponsor with zero self-serving fanfare.

Likewise, when you say we "need to be the first club to do it though", I would say being e.g. the second club to do it (or third, or fourth...) would be no less principled or ethical.
Click to expand...

Obviously you've decided to take the ultra ethical stance (dare I suggest primarily to take issue with my post 😉 )
Obviously I'm looking to take commercial benefit from it.
End of.
 
Regardless said:
Obviously you've decided to take the ultra ethical stance (dare I suggest primarily to take issue with my post 😉 )
Obviously I'm looking to take commercial benefit from it.
End of.
Click to expand...
Not everything has to have a pound-sign attached to it.

Especially not when it's also labelled "principled and ethical".

If it's important to do it because it's the principled and ethical thing to do, then just do it.
 
Chip Barm said:
Anyone would think the time to discuss club sponsorships was on the horizon.
Click to expand...
Was it not only a one year deal?

If it weren't for the fact that we end up with badged training kits I'd be up for us going with Paddy Power and their sponsor free kit campaign as a compromise...
 
Back
Top