Skip to main content

How Much Time Does AN Get

How Much Time Does AN Get

To play Hugill as the one up top, you need the 3 behind him chipping in with at least 20 between them for the season for it to be effective.

As it is, we'll be lucky if they bag 10 between them for the season so therefore, a different type of striker to Hugill is required as the one.

I would go with either of these. Of course, I presume that we'll sign Ledson.

Pearson Ledson
Bodin Harrop Maquire
Moult​

or

Pearson Ledson
Bodin Harrop Barkhuizen
Maquire​

Of course, I would prefer to see this.

Bodin Pearson Ledson Barks/Robbo/Harrop
Moult Maquire​

The defence is as you were Fisher Hunts Davies Cunningham. Toss a coin for the Keepers.

big plus one , the three behind are crucial !
 
To play Hugill as the one up top, you need the 3 behind him chipping in with at least 20 between them for the season for it to be effective.

As it is, we'll be lucky if they bag 10 between them for the season so therefore, a different type of striker to Hugill is required as the one.

I would go with either of these. Of course, I presume that we'll sign Ledson.

Pearson Ledson
Bodin Harrop Maquire
Moult​

or

Pearson Ledson
Bodin Harrop Barkhuizen
Maquire​

Of course, I would prefer to see this.

Bodin Pearson Ledson Barks/Robbo/Harrop
Moult Maquire​

The defence is as you were Fisher Hunts Davies Cunningham. Toss a coin for the Keepers.

I'd go with wither of the first two but I expect long term we will see more of the first. Be interested to see if option 3 would work but I don't always buy into the 2 up too. I think with the right 3 behind it can be more effective.
 
I can't be bothered reading the entire thread, sorry, but I'm sure most of what needs to be said has been.

There's probably no one on here who was a bigger fan of Grayson than I was, and I was disappointed he left. Largely because I felt we would actually progress this season to have a real shot of the PO's under him.

However he went and was replaced by a man I was in 2 minds about, however let's slow down a little bit. No one can seriously be talking about getting rid already. I've said from the beginning that he will get 2.5-3 years from me to fully implement his ideas, develop the squad as he sees fit and move us hopefully into the top end of the division. Hopefully over that period we will see more variation on styles of play, formations and tactics as this is currently lacking IMO. More changes from the subs would be nice as well rather than more like for like swaps.

This is as long as we're not involved in a relegation fight which we clearly aren't this season and I don't expect us to be next.

The summer window was a disaster. Fisher has been a positive but only signing Mavadidi as an attacking option just wasn't good enough. We went from talking about needing 3 or 4 more players to signing a young lad on loan who lasted 5 months. This window has been more positive with the much needed attacking options being added and hopefully a CM to follow by Wednesday night.

So, this season, the next and the one after at least IMO.
 
I can't be bothered reading the entire thread, sorry, but I'm sure most of what needs to be said has been.

There's probably no one on here who was a bigger fan of Grayson than I was, and I was disappointed he left. Largely because I felt we would actually progress this season to have a real shot of the PO's under him.

However he went and was replaced by a man I was in 2 minds about, however let's slow down a little bit. No one can seriously be talking about getting rid already. I've said from the beginning that he will get 2.5-3 years from me to fully implement his ideas, develop the squad as he sees fit and move us hopefully into the top end of the division. Hopefully over that period we will see more variation on styles of play, formations and tactics as this is currently lacking IMO. More changes from the subs would be nice as well rather than more like for like swaps.

This is as long as we're not involved in a relegation fight which we clearly aren't this season and I don't expect us to be next.

The summer window was a disaster. Fisher has been a positive but only signing Mavadidi as an attacking option just wasn't good enough. We went from talking about needing 3 or 4 more players to signing a young lad on loan who lasted 5 months. This window has been more positive with the much needed attacking options being added and hopefully a CM to follow by Wednesday night.

So, this season, the next and the one after at least IMO.

considering you havent read the thread , you have pretty much summed it up with your whole post !
 
Ha ha cheers I haven’t logged on since Friday so was only having a skim through the ‘popular’ threads.

Only correction I would make is the signing of Maguire as an option. Other than that you have have every main point nailed on
 
This was post number 4. Why we needed another 160 comments after this one summed everything up perfectly is beyond me.

Not much of a debater then, a forum where you throw ideas around.

Have you read the whole thread ?
 
Not much of a debater then, a forum where you throw ideas around.

Have you read the whole thread ?

I was one of the early rejectors of this thread but I have to say it has raised some of the best actual debate we have seen on here in some time.
 
I was one of the early rejectors of this thread but I have to say it has raised some of the best actual debate we have seen on here in some time.

Cheers paddy, part of the problem is people are not reading the whole thread , then throw in the fact I baited then switched a few pages in. I for one enjoyed it livened up dull Sunday.
 
Just to add...

BBC said:
Preston are currently enjoying their longest away unbeaten run in the Championship (six games) since August 2009, when they went seven without defeat.
 
And that rolls on

Yeah but "how much time does AN get? We can't keep just constantly blaming players..at the moment we are creating nothing and not able to string 3 passes together."

Oh wait a minute, you didn't actually mean any of that and you were being deliberately ambiguous.

😀😀😉
 
Yeah but "how much time does AN get? We can't keep just constantly blaming players..at the moment we are creating nothing and not able to string 3 passes together."

Oh wait a minute, you didn't actually mean any of that and you were being deliberately ambiguous.

😀😀😉

Did you reply to post 155 ? Where I actually pointed out the deliberate ambiguity ? No , I dont think you did tuggs ......... I know its hard to accept that people have the ability to bait and switch and write things they dont mean to stimulate debate, to some a spade is a spade , I guess your in that bracket. 🙂

Thank god for creative thinkers.

Made up with the three points , long may it continue.

edit : ps if you want me to give you another proof element of where I did something similar on this forum , just give us another nod , the joke is serioulsy on you , I am sat here crying at you takeing the bait
 
Last edited:
Back
Top