- Joined
- Nov 8, 2005
- Messages
- 6,233
If Ledson played as many games as Ben did a season he would have 4 or 5 red cards, where are the people calling for his head about his disciplinary record? Nowhere to be found. Hypocrites the lot of you
Yes, PNEJack, you have a point. I'm unsure hypocrite is the correct word to use; double-standards is the term to describe what you are accusing people of.
Pearson has a bigger problem due to his attitude towards referees, which is needlessly detrimental to his performances and that of his team, rather than the naive and honest work of Ledson, albeit producing, as you say, the same detriment to the team.
Ledson has clearly been told to get-stuck-in by the management - Steve Thompson loved snapping people. I still remember the tackle on John Thomas' leg from Thompson, at Burnden Park in the late 1980s, the noise still haunts me, as does the memory of Thomas' waggling lower leg - and perhaps Ledson is more adept at nicking the ball in a tackle, rather than thundering into them like Sean Gregan. Ledson has a bit of work to do on his pressing game, but he can only be accused of being naive, rather than cynical, and Neil may think he needs him to become a tougher proposition in the midfield, at this level, if he is to compete with the best players.
It is clear that the management want to play a high pressing game. This means that all - not some - of the players need to be invested in the tactics. Sooner or later, the mistake Neil may make is to be too confident that he can turn a skilful player into a workhorse, and vice versa. No matter how hard you push, you can't always fit a square peg into a round hole. For instance, Johnson and Robinson tend to stroll about a bit - in their natural style - but it leaves a lot of work for the other players to do, who are trying to follow team orders.
Neil is all about the overall team-product, and Ledson may have been forced into a style of high intensity midfield-play to which he hasn't been used.
For me, Ledson is a superb passer of the ball, and Neil knows this. Neil is a good manager because he tries to improve the weaknesses in his players but Ledson may not be the Souness-type midfield general he seeks to produce and bookings may be the consequence of this attempt at transformation.
As you say, reckless challenges can't continue to hinder the side even if it is following team orders, and if Ledson simply can't tackle properly, then he will continue to be the liability your post describes, as is Pearson with his attitude.
There is an argument for Neil to sign a genuine combative midfielder - Mark Rankine style - rather than trying to reform ball players into that role.