Skip to main content

Overall observations

Overall observations

Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
1,960
The first half performance against Barnsley was excellent even taking into account that PNE got lucky with the sending-off and the goal that even Patrick Agyemang admits he knew nothing about and was gifted by an inexperienced goalkeeper.
In the second-half though PNE were quite simply outsmarted. Barnsley had a game-plan, keeping things tight, swamping midfield and preventing Preston getting play out to the flanks and then throwing on another forward late on and going for the win. It very nearly worked and only Carlo Nash's foot prevented them getting at least a point.
It was worrying that the team and/or Paul Simpson failed to respond. Indeed, amazingly Preston have not really got going yet (i.e. there's not been a game in which they have fully convinced for 90 minutes) but they are in third place. I only hope the current luck holds and that when some of the other player options are back (Davidson; Mellor; Ormerod; O'Neil - what's happening with him by the way) things will improve.
I've normally been a fan of Matty Hill but he had a poor game (not helped by slipping all the time) and surely Davidson will be back when fit and he'll be much more solid.
Nugent linked up well tonight I thought but his shooting boots weren't on but I'm confident he'll get goals with more games and as usual Dichio was very good when he got the service and made at least three goal-scoring opportunities.
Nash was excellent as usual and Chilvers is definitely getting better. (Is Lucketti coming back here on loan for cover as most seemed to think the other week? I hope so).
Whaley was man of the match in the first-half and really lively but was denied any service in the second.
"Three points is 3 points" as people point out BUT let's not kid ourselves that there weren't any warning signs!
PS At least the game has stopped the talk about Billy Davies!!
 
Re: Overall observations

tonypne said:
The first half performance against Barnsley was excellent even taking into account that PNE got lucky with the sending-off and the goal that even Patrick Agyemang admits he knew nothing about and was gifted by an inexperienced goalkeeper.
In the second-half though PNE were quite simply outsmarted. Barnsley had a game-plan, keeping things tight, swamping midfield and preventing Preston getting play out to the flanks and then throwing on another forward late on and going for the win. It very nearly worked and only Carlo Nash's foot prevented them getting at least a point.
It was worrying that the team and/or Paul Simpson failed to respond. Indeed, amazingly Preston have not really got going yet (i.e. there's not been a game in which they have fully convinced for 90 minutes) but they are in third place. I only hope the current luck holds and that when some of the other player options are back (Davidson; Mellor; Ormerod; O'Neil - what's happening with him by the way) things will improve.
I've normally been a fan of Matty Hill but he had a poor game (not helped by slipping all the time) and surely Davidson will be back when fit and he'll be much more solid.
Nugent linked up well tonight I thought but his shooting boots weren't on but I'm confident he'll get goals with more games and as usual Dichio was very good when he got the service and made at least three goal-scoring opportunities.
Nash was excellent as usual and Chilvers is definitely getting better. (Is Lucketti coming back here on loan for cover as most seemed to think the other week? I hope so).
Whaley was man of the match in the first-half and really lively but was denied any service in the second.
"Three points is 3 points" as people point out BUT let's not kid ourselves that there weren't any warning signs!
PS At least the game has stopped the talk about Billy Davies!!
what tripe how did we get lucky with the sending off keeper knew exactly what he was doing he took the ball off paddys foot
 
Re: Overall observations

amw said:
what tripe how did we get lucky with the sending off keeper knew exactly what he was doing he took the ball off paddys foot

Didn't mean lucky in that it wasn't a sending off. The referee was clearly right. I meant lucky in that their goalkeeper had a brainstorm, they went down to ten men and an inexperienced goalkeeper came on but for which PNE wouldn't have won.
 
Re: Overall observations

tonypne said:
an inexperienced goalkeeper came on but for which PNE wouldn't have won.

Oh you know that for a fact do you, we played well first half and Barnsley made it difficult the second, we gained 3 more points and kept another clean sheet. We are up to 3rd in the table, whats bad about that..NOTHING AT ALL. 🙂
 
Re: Overall observations

keith750cc said:
Oh you know that for a fact do you, we played well first half and Barnsley made it difficult the second, we gained 3 more points and kept another clean sheet. We are up to 3rd in the table, whats bad about that..NOTHING AT ALL. 🙂

Nothing bad about that at all. I'm very pleased too, but Paul Simpson said: "The performance could have been a lot better." What's wrong with admitting that as he did, analysing the match and looking at how things could be improved?
 
Re: Overall observations

amw said:
what tripe how did we get lucky with the sending off keeper knew exactly what he was doing he took the ball off paddys foot


if the keeper had not been sent off the game would have been far more open - I'd have backe paddy and nuge to take advantage of that.

As it was they went to 441 and kept it tight - defensively they were unchaged but taking fewer risks.

we would have doone better aginst 11!
 
Back
Top