rules

[pkbpne22]

Only after Pol Pot has posted his address and phone number on the forum, and Inspector Cox has run his particulars past INTERPOL.

Presumably Interpol would be playing this in reference to the two !!😉

 

[MOSSYPNE]

I ain't derek shaw lol
Neither am I a WUM.
I mearly stated on a thread which was the first I read that there was so many rules broken. In another thread I read it was full of banned profiles hence my question. Why do some get away wiyh blatant rule breaks when others are jumed on from a great height?
I thought it was a perfectly reasonable question.
one person imparticular stood out for there abuse. Voldemort.
now whilst his threads I have read have been interesting some a little way into delusional I find in every thread he is on he is abusive to woplw calling them morons or northern monkeys. Yet when sn opposition supporter comes on and does the same. Banned.

Why is it one rule for one and another for someone else?

Will you stop fucking whinging you fucking woman.


See, you're making me fucking swear now.

 

[White Womble]

F, some (many 1000's) are members .

as a matter if interest, could you post info on how many active posters there are as opposed to silent members?

 

[MOSSYPNE]

as a matter if interest, could you post info on how many active posters there are as opposed to silent members?

Why?

Just out of interest.

 

[pkbpne22]

as a matter if interest, could you post info on how many active posters there are as opposed to silent members?

You mean you won't do the research for yourself??🙄

 

[White Womble]

Why?

Just out of interest.

qutoting overall membership numbers is flawed data if 90% of the population signs on, then deserts - ACTIVE posters and ACTIVE lurkers are the relevant data

 

[White Womble]

You mean you won't do the research for yourself??🙄

I'm assuming the forum owner has the data available at a few mouse clicks - readers can't without counting every post manually.

 

[Longshanks]

qutoting overall membership numbers is flawed data if 90% of the population signs on, then deserts - ACTIVE posters and ACTIVE lurkers are the relevant data

 

[MOSSYPNE]

qutoting overall membership numbers is flawed data if 90% of the population signs on, then deserts - ACTIVE posters and ACTIVE lurkers are the relevant data

Wow.

...........

 

[raefil]

as a matter if interest, could you post info on how many active posters there are as opposed to silent members?

We dont know how many are silent because they never post.

 

[jaymo]

I ain't derek shaw lol
Neither am I a WUM.
I mearly stated on a thread which was the first I read that there was so many rules broken. In another thread I read it was full of banned profiles hence my question. Why do some get away wiyh blatant rule breaks when others are jumed on from a great height?
I thought it was a perfectly reasonable question.
one person imparticular stood out for there abuse. Voldemort.
now whilst his threads I have read have been interesting some a little way into delusional I find in every thread he is on he is abusive to woplw calling them morons or northern monkeys. Yet when sn opposition supporter comes on and does the same. Banned.

Why is it one rule for one and another for someone else?

Which thread was it fella?

 

[preston4ever]

New Regime is the one where Voldemort has his u#what seems now usual attack.

Being new to the forum I have been reading threads whilst sat bored at work on my phone and whilst travelling about.
It beggers belief what he is allowed to come out with. I would expect to be banned for abusing people like he does, Yet opposition supporters come and and call us Northern cunts and so on and they get banned. Kind of double standards.