- Joined
- Apr 6, 2012
- Messages
- 31,198
I'm just going to say three magic words.
Time. For. Olosunde.
Who?
I'm just going to say three magic words.
Time. For. Olosunde.
The invisible man?Who?
I didn't say he had. I just think its strange he's been out of favour when we desperately need him. I've started to wonder why that's all.
I wasn't sure that you did subscribe to that view or not. Certainly others do. No offence intended.
DJ started 6 out of the first 8 games (back when many thought that the "brand" existed, and was just needing some better finishing). In the next 15 games he only started 3 of them: Burnley at home (draw), Bristol away (defeat), and Reading away (win).
After the WC break he played really well at Rovers (where our tactics were spot on), was then hit and miss against QPR and poor vs Huddersfield at home. He didn't play against the Baggies but then started the next 2 (Stoke away, and Huddersfield at home in the Cup). He played alright in both of those games, which we won. He then started against Norwich and was poor - though not as bad as our tactics and team selection. He hasn't started a game since.
To my mind his form doesn't indicate that he has downed tools. Has he been better in previous seasons? Yes, but the same could be said about a lot of our players this season, and I don't think that he warrants being snubbed in favour of Woodburn, Onomah and Ledson.
Great post. More balanced than I can be.I wasn't sure that you did subscribe to that view or not. Certainly others do. No offence intended.
DJ started 6 out of the first 8 games (back when many thought that the "brand" existed, and was just needing some better finishing). In the next 15 games he only started 3 of them: Burnley at home (draw), Bristol away (defeat), and Reading away (win).
After the WC break he played really well at Rovers (where our tactics were spot on), was then hit and miss against QPR and poor vs Huddersfield at home. He didn't play against the Baggies but then started the next 2 (Stoke away, and Huddersfield at home in the Cup). He played alright in both of those games, which we won. He then started against Norwich and was poor - though not as bad as our tactics and team selection. He hasn't started a game since.
To my mind his form doesn't indicate that he has downed tools. Has he been better in previous seasons? Yes, but the same could be said about a lot of our players this season, and I don't think that he warrants being snubbed in favour of Woodburn, Onomah and Ledson.
That formation would be like a breath of fresh air even if it didn’t work!Let's "build" on Wednesday by adding a striker and someone who can create chances:
Woodman
Browne Storey Cunningham Hughes Fernandez
McCann Johnson
Parrott
Cannon Delap
He found the net at Huddersfield last August and didn't score again until 2 months later at Norwich, and even that was debateable. I hope the penalty on Wednesday will be the start of a scoring run for him, but I'm not convinced.We should stick with the 3.5.2 formation which is the only one in which we have performed with any consistency this season. That has to mean Potts on the right and Fernandez on the left with Browne as one of the central three with McCann who played really well in the last match also there. RL has two fundamental decisions to make. The first is does he recall Lindsay if he is fit again - that would have to be at the expense of either Hughes or Cunningham with the argument for doing so being that Lindsay's height might be particularly useful. The second is how he copes with Whiteman's suspension though frankly Whiteman was playing so poorly before his sending off on Wednesday that his place might have been in doubt in any case. The options are either to go as like-for-like as possible which would mean recalling Ledson or to use McCann in the deeper lying role and bring in Johnson or Woodburn to add some further creativity. Upfront it should be Parrott with either Cannon or Delap - I have said all along that once Parrott found the net he would start to do so regularly. But to play all three of those from the start would just give us three strikers starved of service - two strikers with a more creative midfield behind them just makes more sense. It would also mean that we would have a genuine striking option in reserve. Brady could also then be a back-up option - but as a wide player because one thing he is not is a central midfielder.
It was my theory he dropped gash players like Ledson, Woodburn, Etc on Wed only so they’d be rested for Saturday. Brady too, but he’s more out of form than gash.
It was my theory he dropped gash players like Ledson, Woodburn, Etc on Wed only so they’d be rested for Saturday. Brady too, but he’s more out of form than gash.
Yep, I agree.
Ledson will come back in because Whiteman is out but I fully expect Woodburn to start today. He can’t seem to leave him out for a prolonged period of time even though he offers 0.
As if by magic…😂😂😂😂
Lowe's ego is probably desperate for Woodburn to come good so he can say I told you so, and repeatedly mention how he resurrected his career. His little vanity project.😂😂😂😂