Skip to main content

Transfer Deadline Day Thread

Transfer Deadline Day Thread

Aside from our own signings, the only deadline day transfer that I am envious about is that of Windass to Wigan. I was banging on about him on here in his Accrington days.

I believe that AN tried for him last summer.

At least I'll see him at Deepdale once this season. Injuries etc permitting.

Don’t think he’s any better than Bodin. Hasn’t set Scotland alight and Rangers fans are glad to see the back of him. Strange really because I thought he was decent but having been to watch Rangers a few times he’s nothing special.
 
That wasn't my question, if you can't answer it then fair enough.

It was answered obviously you do not understand it .IF IF IF So he scores twenty then what we will lose him either back to city or some other club because he will be out our price range . How about we invest in a striker who may or may not score twenty just like this one BUT he is ours to do as we please with. We need a striker not a loanee who can go back when it suits he may turn out shite then what . I will tell you every one on here will be saying why haven't we bought a striker we know we have needed one for months now.
 
It was answered obviously you do not understand it .IF IF IF So he scores twenty then what we will lose him either back to city or some other club because he will be out our price range . How about we invest in a striker who may or may not score twenty just like this one BUT he is ours to do as we please with. We need a striker not a loanee who can go back when it suits he may turn out shite then what . I will tell you every one on here will be saying why haven't we bought a striker we know we have needed one for months now.

So are you suggesting we didn't benefit from Pickford on loan? or McGeady?

It doesn't matter that they will be gone after this season, let's focus on this season for now! We needed more options and now we have them, happy days.

The method you suggest implies that we could sign permanently one of these incredible youngsters who will score 20 goals in a season. Not going to happen, the best youngsters are generally in the academies - FACT. There's a reason they end up at City and the like, it's because they're likely to be good enough. The big clubs stockpile youngsters so they can cherry pick the best as they get to 20 ish.

Not only that, but if we were to have this young superstar striker in our ranks, how long do you think he would be here for? A year, maybe two of first team football?! Then sold off, money slapped into the bank and job done. It's only a long term solution to go for youth if you're going to keep hold of them and continually develop new youngsters.

We also do not have an academy or the facilities to compete for these young lads permanently. Think about it, you're 16 and you have an offer from City and Preston. Where are you going? City will pay you 10x more, their facilities are unreal, if you make it you're at the top level. It's obvious why these lads don't come here permanently.

As much as you don't want to admit it, there are young players in academies that can come to the Championship and make an impact straight away, Abraham for example. They're not all shite pampered kids...

Alternatively, we just buy a 20 goal a season striker? Not going to happen. Have you seen the price of average Championship strikers nowadays? Hugill couldn't score 20 in a season and we got 10 million quid for him! Look at the fees other strikers in the Championship are going for. You're dreaming if you think we will compete with that.

The loan market is part of football and a big part outside the Prem. You can't just ignore it because you want all the players to be your own.
 
Last edited:
It was answered obviously you do not understand it .IF IF IF So he scores twenty then what we will lose him either back to city or some other club because he will be out our price range . How about we invest in a striker who may or may not score twenty just like this one BUT he is ours to do as we please with. We need a striker not a loanee who can go back when it suits he may turn out shite then what . I will tell you every one on here will be saying why haven't we bought a striker we know we have needed one for months now.

e have been on the look out for a striker now for months sorry just borrowing two players is not going to help us in the long run, no matter how well they do or not .

I have quoted the specific part of your post where you say borrowing two players will not help us in the long run, but if Nmecha scores 20 goals and we get promoted I think the 160 million we get from the Premier League will help us in the long run or do you disagree with that?

The lad probably won't be able to be recalled until the end of the season, I'm sure PR will have made sure that was part of the agreement.

Maybe PR and AN looked for what was available that was within our price range and saw that this lad was much better than what was on offer and at a more competitive price, we are not in the business of signing for signing sake.
 
Have much would you say Nmecha is worth on the open market as it stands being young, U21 International and a City player?
 
I have quoted the specific part of your post where you say borrowing two players will not help us in the long run, but if Nmecha scores 20 goals and we get promoted I think the 160 million we get from the Premier League will help us in the long run or do you disagree with that?

The lad probably won't be able to be recalled until the end of the season, I'm sure PR will have made sure that was part of the agreement.

Maybe PR and AN looked for what was available that was within our price range and saw that this lad was much better than what was on offer and at a more competitive price, we are not in the business of signing for signing sake.

Exactly! If they help us go up and then get recalled then we start again with just a couple of positions but with a lot more funds! By the sounds of it Barker is on his last year of contract so if he turns out to be a blinder then he could be an option to tie up as a permanent. If we got Walters in, or whoever, as a permanent on a 2 year contract do people think they'd still be first choice if we went up? They'd just be a means to an end with a new list of targets lined up for Prem intentions.
 
No, tell me more.
Was at Villa everything agreed they were due to sign the contract, were in the middle of doing press shots with the shirt and what not when his agent got a call saying Fulham were interested.

Bryan and the agent fucked off with Bruce asking where they were going.

Have a look at the Bristol City Twitter page for the gif they shared about it all.

Sent from my fingers powered by fairy dust
 
We bring in a striker and the reaction of some is, "why haven't we brought in a striker", you couldn't make it up....

Totally agree; we have 2 striker, 2 good strikers that help the team in different ways and nmecha who seems like he could be a tammy...and then we have Maguire when he gets back.
 
Was at Villa everything agreed they were due to sign the contract, were in the middle of doing press shots with the shirt and what not when his agent got a call saying Fulham were interested.

Bryan and the agent fucked off with Bruce asking where they were going.

Have a look at the Bristol City Twitter page for the gif they shared about it all.

Sent from my fingers powered by fairy dust

We did a similar thing with Youl Mawene. He was about to sign for Wolves, then he got a phone call from Brian O’Neil suggesting he came to PNE.
 
Back
Top