But he wasn't played mate.
Thats what was doing my head in. If the bloke who replaced him had some quality i could accept it,but we had Sedgwick lumping up and down the few yards either side of the halfway line.
Poor management in my book.
your entitled to your opinion but i think your very wrong about sedg and i know hes not a world beater, but hes more consistant than whaley. I'm not dismissing whaley cos i reckon he could be a real top player for us. Si Has bags of potential. He also has plenty of pace which sedg lacks.
But i'd wish whaley would just perform like he did when we first signed him.