Skip to main content

Attacking Quality vs Work Effort

Attacking Quality vs Work Effort

Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
278
Location
Ashton
Since we restarted our campaign there has been a glaring contradiction apparent within our team selection. Neil appears to be in a difficult situation with regards to picking a starting 11 which has both Dangerous attacking threat and strong work effort.

Neil clearly likes to have players like Brown, Barky, Pearson, Seani etc etc Who are sharp off the ball and work their knackers off - thus allowing us to dominate the midfield and be first to 50/50’s. This is all well good so long as we actually score and convert that midfield domination into clear cut chances.

Unfortunately, these players might only convert 1-2 out of every 10 chances Created. Last night we brought on Sinclair, Potts, Stockley and they scored goals which were not easy opportunities... they required both composure and accurate shots on target. These players who came on added threat but they won’t run themselves into the ground like the afore mentioned.

Which brings me onto the reason for the thread; would we prefer to take a hit in the midfield domination side of things so that we Are more potent in front of goal? Or alternately, maintain the grit and fight within our starting 11 but convert less of the chances we create?

The problem, as always, is money... a player who can fight and run but also convert chances are a lot of money... and pretty much get to play in the premiership.
 
I don't know in regards to your question. But the difference I noted last night was that Scott S anticipates play, where as Sean M seems to be slow in reading the pass. Maybe that is why he has become so in-effective as a striker. When he first arrived (pre injury) he had that burst of speed that he may have lost and now highlights his poor reading and postioning. Still can't fault his work rate.
While I'm at it, how great was it watching Potts run at defence and actually scoring a fantastic goal.
 
When we brought the subs on they didn’t have to defend we needed to score and we did, I have stated before if we play the high press quick passing game and we win the ball higher up the pitch our forwards don’t have to run half as far during a match so obviously don’t get as knackerd as quick . As players tire they make decisions like I can’t take anyone on just pass it or shoot from unfavourable positions . Yes they will have to track back sometime but we are a team that play far better on the front foot and last night once again proved that .
 
When we brought the subs on they didn’t have to defend we needed to score and we did, I have stated before if we play the high press quick passing game and we win the ball higher up the pitch our forwards don’t have to run half as far during a match so obviously don’t get as knackerd as quick . As players tire they make decisions like I can’t take anyone on just pass it or shoot from unfavourable positions . Yes they will have to track back sometime but we are a team that play far better on the front foot and last night once again proved that .



Are you listening Alex?
 
Back
Top