Skip to main content

Barky

Barky

Barky

What's wrong with him, because something is!

To be honest other than his purple patch quite early after signing he has been pretty poor...

Obviously has a lot of pace and can chip in with the odd decent goal but I think he is just a quick footballer with not much going on up top football wise


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
To be honest other than his purple patch quite early after signing he has been pretty poor...

Obviously has a lot of pace and can chip in with the odd decent goal but I think he is just a quick footballer with not much going on up top football wise


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You can't do what he did to Reading without having more than just being quick.
Something is clearly amiss and has been so for some time imo.
 
Not the only one

Not the only one

What's wrong with him, because something is!
What a load of absolute tripe. Barky was poor and so was Fisher but it would be difficult to say anything positive about any body. Must be one of the worst matches to be televised tonight and I am sure any neutrals would have switched channels long before the end. Two very poor teams with the only difference being Norwich managed to find the back of the net and other than Robbo's effort in the second half we never once looked a threat. Heaven knows how Neil is going to spur them on for Saturday without a magic wand.
 
What a load of absolute tripe. Barky was poor and so was Fisher but it would be difficult to say anything positive about any body. Must be one of the worst matches to be televised tonight and I am sure any neutrals would have switched channels long before the end. Two very poor teams with the only difference being Norwich managed to find the back of the net and other than Robbo's effort in the second half we never once looked a threat. Heaven knows how Neil is going to spur them on for Saturday without a magic wand.

Back to the old 50 pts and see what we do from there FFS if we are lucky
 
I seem to remember that Grayson thought his best potential position would be down the middle and if you look at those first 6 games I think that is largely where he was successful.

Should AN try him as a striker?
 
Barky hasn't been good for a long time , lazy no first touch and needs 30 yards to push the pall past somebody and beat a man
 
So in your opinion he's done NOTHING since?My point is that ability is there as shown v Reading AS AN EXAMPLE (albeit probably the best example).

He is a quick footballer with a decent shot at times... there is a reason why he went to Morecambe after having Championship experience


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Useless with a capital U along with Fisher and Robinson
Thought Robinson was our best player and nearly scored a worldy.

Barky was totally ineffective again.

Fisher had a mare in the first half but we have no one putting pressure on him.

Upfront toothless!
 
Thought Robinson was our best player and nearly scored a worldy.

Barky was totally ineffective again.

Fisher had a mare in the first half but we have no one putting pressure on him.

Upfront toothless!

There’s a few stand out under-performers at the moment such as Barky and Fisher, there’s also a few going under the radar.

Browne didn’t look comfortable a bit deeper to me against QPR, and he looked out of his depth in a 2 tonight. Not technical enough to take it, turn, play it forward etc. We have to go back to a 3.

Don’t want to bang the Moult drum yet again but it’s painful to watch at times. He is simply out of his depth, not for lack of trying though.
 
Fisher had a mare, Robbo was our only threat, Barky as has been said is way off, Pearson matches his excellence with his dick headed attitude which sees him booked for foolishness time after time, Hughes is a find, Hunts should never have been dropped. We offer next to nothing up front still but there is no need to worry as our recruitment has been completely acceptable !!!
 
I seem to remember that Grayson thought his best potential position would be down the middle and if you look at those first 6 games I think that is largely where he was successful.

Should AN try him as a striker?

I think he’s bereft of both form and confidence but this is certainly what I’d do. We’re borderline obsessed on this forum with complicating the preferred position of players, to the point where most people don’t consider Barkhuizen a striker anymore even though it’s where he himself says he’s most comfortable (and where he’s looked incredibly dangerous in the few times we saw him there under Grayson). At worst he’d be punchless and if that were the case he’d be no different to our other strikers!
 
There’s a few stand out under-performers at the moment such as Barky and Fisher, there’s also a few going under the radar.

Browne didn’t look comfortable a bit deeper to me against QPR, and he looked out of his depth in a 2 tonight. Not technical enough to take it, turn, play it forward etc. We have to go back to a 3.

Don’t want to bang the Moult drum yet again but it’s painful to watch at times. He is simply out of his depth, not for lack of trying though.

Completely agree with this 100 %
 
There’s a few stand out under-performers at the moment such as Barky and Fisher, there’s also a few going under the radar.

Browne didn’t look comfortable a bit deeper to me against QPR, and he looked out of his depth in a 2 tonight. Not technical enough to take it, turn, play it forward etc. We have to go back to a 3.

Don’t want to bang the Moult drum yet again but it’s painful to watch at times. He is simply out of his depth, not for lack of trying though.

Thought for a bit now that Browne is going to become a problem. Not creative enough for the 10, not able to progress play well enough in the 6. Has energy so may be best utilised in the big games as the 3rd midfielder.

Can see it becoming an issue.
 
Back
Top