Skip to main content

Daniel Iversen

Daniel Iversen

BPIG - GBNF said:
I didn’t rate him as highly as most of our fans seem to. His shot stopping is very good. Personally though his distribution is shocking, panics with the ball at his feet, handling wasn’t near top level. Prone to errors too.

Overall I think he’s a good keeper, but for me he’s not even close to Pickford or Johnstone. Not too bothered that we haven’t got him back.
Click to expand...
and trust us... BPIG knows a good keeper when he sees one.....(even if B'Pool cant)
 
BPIG - GBNF said:
I didn’t rate him as highly as most of our fans seem to. His shot stopping is very good. Personally though his distribution is shocking, panics with the ball at his feet, handling wasn’t near top level. Prone to errors too.

Overall I think he’s a good keeper, but for me he’s not even close to Pickford or Johnstone. Not too bothered that we haven’t got him back.
Click to expand...

I have to take exception to the highlighted bit. Although there's room for improvement in his distribution, it isn't shocking. Also remember we didn't have any quality wingbacks for him to distribute too. He did often hold onto it a bit too long, and his kicking wasn't particularly accurate but I can't remember any howlers.
Shop stopping 10 out of 10, if any of that is caused by lack of communication with his fellow defenders we will find out this season.
 
We've been a little spoilt with some of the keepers we've had on loan.

In my opinion, of all of the keepers we've had in the last decade, the top 3 are Pickford, Iversen and Johnstone.

Iversen is a better shot-stopper than the lot. Some of the things he did for us last year were laughable. Even if his distribution isn't quite as solid as Pickford's.

He's more than earned a shot as a number 1 in the Premier League.
 
BPIG - GBNF said:
I didn’t rate him as highly as most of our fans seem to. His shot stopping is very good. Personally though his distribution is shocking, panics with the ball at his feet, handling wasn’t near top level. Prone to errors too.

Overall I think he’s a good keeper, but for me he’s not even close to Pickford or Johnstone. Not too bothered that we haven’t got him back.
Click to expand...

Sure a lot would laugh at that, but I imagine you’ve seen a lot of keepers up close watching your brother and pick up on things we don’t.

Still think Pickford was a level above anything we’ve had. I’d then say Iversen and Johnstone just behind.
 
Warton PNE said:
Sure a lot would laugh at that, but I imagine you’ve seen a lot of keepers up close watching your brother and pick up on things we don’t.

Still think Pickford was a level above anything we’ve had. I’d then say Iversen and Johnstone just behind.
Click to expand...
Pickford is number one by a considerable distance. Incredible saves, commanding his box, vocal and the best distribution I've seen from any goalkeeper live. Was just blatantly obvious he would be England's number one.
 
MrHodgeheg123 said:
YOU ARE THE WORST WUM.................EVER
Click to expand...
Which parts a wind up?

Johnstones contribution ended with us winning 4-0 at Wembley and lifting a trophy, the aim of the sport.

Iversons was losing 4-0 at Luton and conceding the most goals since returning to this level.
 
Randall Flagg said:
Pickford is number one by a considerable distance. Incredible saves, commanding his box, vocal and the best distribution I've seen from any goalkeeper live. Was just blatantly obvious he would be England's number one.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Like Ederson, Pickford could probably play in midfield and wouldn’t look out of place. He can pick a pass to anyone on the pitch.

Incredibly underrated because of how poor Everton are defensively.
 
Double J said:
Which parts a wind up?

Johnstones contribution ended with us winning 4-0 at Wembley and lifting a trophy, the aim of the sport.

Iversons was losing 4-0 at Luton and conceding the most goals since returning to this level.
Click to expand...
Here we go.
And Harry Kane is shit 'cause he's won nowt whereby Origi is much better as he has trophies to his name.
You're sure no Vulcan.
 
MrHodgeheg123 said:
Here we go.
And Harry Kane is shit 'cause he's won nowt whereby Origi is much better as he has trophies to his name.
You're sure no Vulcan.
Click to expand...
Ones who have achieved the aim of the sport tend to be better than those who consistently fail.

Correct, well done.

In terms of Origi and Kane. One stepped up and won his team the Champions League, whilst the other stunk out the same final, and the 3 other finals he’s played. Doesn’t take Einstein to work out who’s better at the sport.
 
Double J said:
Ones who have achieved the aim of the sport tend to be better than those who consistently fail.

Correct, well done.

In terms of Origi and Kane. One stepped up and won his team the Champions League, whilst the other stunk out the same final, and the 3 other finals he’s played. Doesn’t take Einstein to work out who’s better at the sport.
Click to expand...
So how come one is worth £100m and the other...............?
 
Double J said:
Ones who have achieved the aim of the sport tend to be better than those who consistently fail.

Correct, well done.

In terms of Origi and Kane. One stepped up and won his team the Champions League, whilst the other stunk out the same final, and the 3 other finals he’s played. Doesn’t take Einstein to work out who’s better at the sport.
Click to expand...

By your own rules Johnstone winning play offs in a division below the level that Iversen played at? How does that work out? Especially at similar points in there careers.

You’ve almost backed yourself in a corner there mate.
 
Back
Top