- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 4,629
It is also understood the Preston players were unable to wear the shirts last week because none had been left in their dressing room by Reading staff.
Football should not be used as a platform for any form of political campaigning.
Trying to eradicate racism from Football is not a political campaign.Football should not be used as a platform for any form of political campaigning.
This weekend alone there were 3/4 different reports of players being racially abused. Just because you've never seen or heard it at Deepdale (I haven't either, thankfully) doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.Racial abuse is totally unacceptable in any context and football clubs, authorities and fans should always seek to oppose it and people found to indulge in it should suffer penalties. 'Racism' is a sectarian ideological concept that sees such abuse as inevitably directed by a 'majority' against various 'minorities' and as somehow 'institutionalised' in society at large. The 'anti-racism' that claims to oppose it is I think all too often concerned with inventing it in order to justify itself. I might add that some time back I brought a couple of friends of mine up from London to watch PNE at our place - a married couple of whom she is 'black' and he is 'white' and they both commented on how easy going and friendly our ground and the people in it were. That is something I am proud of but without going into details I also know that what people describe as 'anti-racism' can easily become a form of witch hunting so it is something I am guarded about.
Football should not be used as a platform for any form of political campaigning.
This weekend alone there were 3/4 different reports of players being racially abused. Just because you've never seen or heard it at Deepdale (I haven't either, thankfully) doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.
neither is the rainbow laces campaign in support of the LGBT+ movement.
I am afraid the 'rainbow laces' campaign is highly sectarian and about promoting a deeply partisan and increasingly authoritarian agenda. Which bit of the 'LGBT' movement do you support when lesbian women - just like non-lesbian women - say they do not want men who claim to be women sharing changing rooms and competing against them in sporting events. They often find they do not get much 'acceptance' for their views from people who claim to be 'tolerant'. Not saying that is how you are but the 'LGBT' movement can be very intolerant and coercive especially when some of its own contradictions are highlighted and if I were a professional footballer asked to wear rainbow laces I would refuse even if that meant being dropped. By the way before you ask yes I do have 'gay' friends and I am perfectly well aware that gay people have suffered from prejudice in the past. Indeed I once spent a week-end on what felt like a suicide watch for a gay friend falsely accused of a sexual misdemeanour when the authorities were prepared to 'fit up' people for such offences. But some elements of the modern 'LGBT' movement are, frankly, no better. Anyhow that I all I will say on this. As of now I am focussed on tomorrow's match.
What is ridiculous on the LGBT front is that, if I remember an interview with John Barnes correctly (last week on 5Live), he said that not one footballer had come out at the top level in the UK. He said there were two in Germany, one in Australia... and I think one, or maybe a handful, in the USA.
How ridiculous is it that you can go round the whole ("western") world and count the number of current openly gay players on your fingers?! He also asked the question how many gay players there were in other contact sports. Also apparently almost none! So we really shouldn't be having a go at football here.
On racism, Barnes said that there's little point in tackling racism in football - because racist will always find a way. Even if it's just booing only black players... because you can't ban booing. He said (perhaps for effect)... forget all that... we need to tackle the root cause of racism and homophobia in football - and that's racism and homophobia in society.
On racism, Barnes said that there's little point in tackling racism in football - because racist will always find a way. Even if it's just booing only black players... because you can't ban booing. He said (perhaps for effect)... forget all that... we need to tackle the root cause of racism and homophobia in football - and that's racism and homophobia in society.
Totally agree with all of that Jack who cares in this day and age . Football on the whole needs to get with it though there are many rugby players who have come out as gay including teams who actually highlight they are gay teams. No one cares and why should they its a game for gods sake .With regards posts about Gay Players, who really cares whether someone is Gay or not? Only the moronic bigots.
What people want to do privately is their own free choice. If a Preston player came out as being Gay, he would have my 100% backing. We are in 2019, not 1919.
How many of your favourite Actors, Actresses, Singers, etc are gay? Exactly and we still love and admire them. Would exactly be the same for that 1st Footballer for the vast majority.
Commercially speaking, I am surprised that nobody has yet taken that plunge.