So if Lashers are fortunate enough to only get relegated on goal difference, we wouldn't mock them if they said they were joint 20th?Joint sixth sounds better.
You're either in a play off position, or you're not. We're not.
So if Lashers are fortunate enough to only get relegated on goal difference, we wouldn't mock them if they said they were joint 20th?Joint sixth sounds better.
Killjoy.So if Lashers are fortunate enough to only get relegated on goal difference, we wouldn't mock them if they said they were joint 20th?
You're either in a play off position, or you're not. We're not.
So if Lashers are fortunate enough to only get relegated on goal difference, we wouldn't mock them if they said they were joint 20th?
You're either in a play off position, or you're not. We're not.
Bigger picture here. You’d have taken this league position at the start of the season all day long. Lest we forget Ryan is in his first job at this level and still learning his trade. He needs backing.
Brady should have started on the right with Alvaro on the left. Both players are not scared of making a decent tackle - which ‘Pottsy’ is !I assume you were replying to my post (just click reply). To repeat, what would you have done? Not what wouldn’t you have done?
By the way, I think that we have the same opinions:
- I assume you wouldn’t have taken Browne and Brady off? Me neither - they were our two best players in my opinion
- alvaro probably could have come on for Potts, with Brady moving over to the right
Brady has been tried on the right and has been largely ineffective. I still don't think Potts is a right wing back, but he's the best we've got.I I’m
Brady should have started on the right with Alvaro on the left. Both players are not scared of making a decent tackle - which ‘Pottsy’ is !
Does that mean we’ve got to wait another 2 years before we get Cole Stockton?Yeah, these I guess:
"They ... had a goal scorer in Flemming who they paid £1.7million for. He scored three goals and sometimes they are the fine margins."Gary has just told me about him and they got Voglsammer too. They paid money for them and that's that little bit of quality - Gary has just said that they've definitely helped them, for where they are. We aren't quite in that position, but if we can add a little bit of something different I'm sure we will be. They might've been found before the (work permit rules) but they are out there, of course. Gary said he’s been after them for 3 years, so he’s had to wait."But no, my lads have been great and we had chances to score goals. Just because you pay £1.7million for someone, it doesn't always turn out. The lad got his hat-trick today and we knew he was one of their danger players, but you have to give Millwall credit as well because they came here and did a job. I felt that we would've won had we got that goal in the second half."
Lowe also confirms Evans was subbed because his hamstring was tight, saying "I thought he was well worthy of a hat-trick".
But the fact is, it was the guy who cost £1.7m who actually got the hat-trick, while the guy(s) who cost considerably less couldn't "get that goal in the second half". Playing the £1.7m guy may not always work, but it'd be nice to at least have the option if we intend sticking around the top 12.
![]()
Ryan Lowe's biggest disappointment in PNE's 2-4 loss to Millwall
Preston North End manager Ryan Lowe was left to rue 'criminal' defending for Millwall's goals as the Lions won 2-4 at Deepdale on Saturday.www.lancs.live
His multi substitutions always leave us looking less of a threat. He seems to think using 5 is obligatory not optionalNever been so shocked by subs as I was for Brady & Browne today. Yes, Browne slightly at fault for the third goal, but Christ he was the most effective central midfielder on the pitch for us by a country mile this afternoon. Brady likewise had done nothing wrong.
I've felt on a couple of occasions this season, particularly Rotherham at home when we were by far the better side for the majority of the game, Lowe's subs have killed any momentum we had. I believe that night he hooked Browne (again) and DJ, could be wrong, but we lost all rhythm as we did today and the game fizzled out to 0-0.
I wonder whether the ability to make 5 subs has actually hindered us more often than its helped. Lowe strikes me as a manager who is quite emotional and reactionary with his substitutions and the fact he can make more of them means he feels he needs to.
His multi substitutions always leave us looking less of a threat. He seems to think using 5 is obligatory not optional
If you're relying on Woodburn (a crisp packet, get rid), then the answer is a resounding NO!Does he have the players on the bench to answer the questions?
He is right though.Killjoy.
One of our best wins this season was beating Norwich 3-2 away.Brady has been tried on the right and has been largely ineffective. I still don't think Potts is a right wing back, but he's the best we've got.
I'm not sure that he does, given this is how many subs he's used in the last half a dozen games:His multi substitutions always leave us looking less of a threat. He seems to think using 5 is obligatory not optional
Not only do they change the players after about 60 mins but normally the formation as well. Havent made any comment on Lowe here but to be honest consider he is doing better than i thought he would. Thought championship managers would outthink him tactically and his stubborness would bring about failureDoes he have the players on the bench to answer the questions?