Mod elections......
brianherron
The Gentry (RIP)
I defended him against your bullying and not for any decision that he may have, or may not have, taken with regards infracting anyone (including you). Like I said earlier - it's become an obsession with you that certain mods were/are 'out to get you' - I know of no evidence to support that view and I doubt that you have.So who justified that pathetic infraction? There'd be 100 infractions daily if they were given out to everybody for such trivia. You were always defending the creepy cunt, and still are by the looks of it. 🙄
My last three infractions were a joke about Yoga, the post quoted and a warning to somebody not to put photos up or they could end up photoshopped. All totally vindictive and unjustified.
shaky
The Gentry (RIP)
Are you going to put yourself forward as a possible Mod Shaky?
I can't because of the spurious and ridiculous infractions. 🙄
shaky
The Gentry (RIP)
I defended him against your bullying and not for any decision that he may have, or may not have, taken with regards infracting anyone (including you). Like I said earlier - it's become an obsession with you that certain mods were/are 'out to get you' - I know of no evidence to support that view and I doubt that you have.
Really?
Profile Infraction 20-12-2009
01:52 PM20-08-2010
03:45 PM 1Abuse of Other Member(s)gazzaholly
01:44 PM22-05-2010
04:45 PM 1Abuse of Other Member(s)gazzaholly
03:18 PMExpired 1Abuse of Other Member(s)Mike
04:23 PMExpired 1persistant abuse of other usersbrianherron
P
PTID
So who justified that pathetic infraction? .
There must have been more than 1 person justifying it and voting to give you an infraction or you wouldn't have gotten one.
shaky
The Gentry (RIP)
There must have been more than 1 person justifying it and voting to give you an infraction or you wouldn't have gotten one.
See the above "who's who" of vindictive bastards.
P
PTID
See the above "who's who" of vindictive bastards.
The WHOLE team had/has to agree to hand out infractions. I gave a few out myself but it wasn't until the rest of the lot had said they agreed with the action and told me to take it.
Stop being a prick.
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2007
- Messages
- 4,619
There must have been more than 1 person justifying it and voting to give you an infraction or you wouldn't have gotten one.
This is right. As a collective the moderators must vote whether to infract or not, if the majority decide to infract then an infraction is issued.
J
jaymo
im just glad you all decided to give that cunt BTKW one.
That day he threw a wobbler was funny as fuck.
That day he threw a wobbler was funny as fuck.
See the above "who's who" of vindictive bastards.
Shaky, your last infraction was discussed at length by the mods, 6 mods voted to infract you, hardly being singled out or victimised by one or two is it!!!!!!
P
PTID
im just glad you all decided to give that cunt BTKW one.
That day he threw a wobbler was funny as fuck.
Ha ha ha ha ha! I still laugh about it now.
"Fuck off Gaymo, and take your Fanny with you!"
😀
shaky
The Gentry (RIP)
Shaky, your last infraction was discussed at length by the mods, 6 mods voted to infract you, hardly being singled out or victimised by one or two is it!!!!!!
For saying the only thing Yoga would be interested in seeing kids open at Christmas was his trouser fly? I thought it was funny, you fuckers must have had a sense of humour bypass.
For saying the only thing Yoga would be interested in seeing kids open at Christmas was his trouser fly? I thought it was funny, you fuckers must have had a sense of humour bypass.
All of us? maybe your "sense of humour" is lost on most of us🙄
shaky
The Gentry (RIP)
All of us? maybe your "sense of humour" is lost on most of us🙄
It's not like the tramp doesn't revel in his Paedo sympathiser role though is it? 🙄
brianherron
The Gentry (RIP)
This selection from your numerous infractions awarded only proves that you received 3 for abuse of other posters and 1 for persistant abuse of other posters - not that there was any person 'out to get you'. Those issuing the infractions do so on the instruction of other mods after the vote is taken and names shown as issuing have no relevance other than being the person carrying out the majority vote. Some mods whilst voting for an infraction will not actually issue one as their names would appear as above and they don't want that to be known - on the other hand some mods will issue the infraction having voted against such a punishment. I believe that it is slightly different now with only the unelected mods able to issue the infraction after the majority vote.Really?
Profile Infraction 20-12-2009
01:52 PM20-08-2010
03:45 PM 1Abuse of Other Member(s)gazzahollyProfile Infraction 30-10-2009![]()
01:44 PM22-05-2010
04:45 PM 1Abuse of Other Member(s)gazzaholly![]()
Stupid Yanks jeering...21-07-2009![]()
03:18 PMExpired 1Abuse of Other Member(s)Mike
Profile Infraction 27-05-2009![]()
04:23 PMExpired 1persistant abuse of other usersbrianherron
shaky
The Gentry (RIP)
This selection from your numerous infractions awarded only proves that you received 3 for abuse of other posters and 1 for persistant abuse of other posters - not that there was any person 'out to get you'. Those issuing the infractions do so on the instruction of other mods after the vote is taken and names shown as issuing have no relevance other than being the person carrying out the majority vote. Some mods whilst voting for an infraction will not actually issue one as their names would appear as above and they don't want that to be known - on the other hand some mods will issue the infraction having voted against such a punishment. I believe that it is slightly different now with only the unelected mods able to issue the infraction after the majority vote.
Look at the usual suspects dishing them out Brian.
The same people who were always at it, for trivial and spurious reasons as you well know.
Joking about Yoga isn't abuse, neither is telling people to be careful about putting photos up, the infraction for the post quoted is ridiculous for all to see. All in all, none of my last four infractions were justified, just childish acts of malice.
J
jaymo
I dont think they do themselves any favours by only quoting one "offending" post as a reason for an infraction, then saying its really an accumulation of numerous posts to be honest with you.Look at the usual suspects dishing them out Brian.
The same people who were always at it, for trivial and spurious reasons as you well know.
Joking about Yoga isn't abuse, neither is telling people to be careful about putting photos up, the infraction for the post quoted is ridiculous for all to see. All in all, none of my last four infractions were justified, just childish acts of malice.
If thats the case, post a selection of the offending posts when doling out the infraction. Much clearer. Thats my view anyway.
I dont think they do themselves any favours by only quoting one "offending" post as a reason for an infraction, then saying its really an accumulation of numerous posts to be honest with you.
If thats the case, post a selection of the offending posts when doling out the infraction. Much clearer. Thats my view anyway.
I want to see who voted and why. The mods should be accountable to the patrons 🙂
When another forum user reports one of your posts I always vote for an infraction to be handed out. 🙂I want to see who voted and why. The mods should be accountable to the patrons 🙂
P
PTID
When another forum user reports one of your posts I always vote for an infraction to be handed out. 🙂
That's victimisation that is!