Skip to main content

Mod elections......

Mod elections......

shaky said:
Really?

Profile Infraction 20-12-2009
01:52 PM20-08-2010
03:45 PM 1Abuse of Other Member(s)gazzaholly
redcard_small.gif
Profile Infraction 30-10-2009

01:44 PM22-05-2010
04:45 PM 1Abuse of Other Member(s)gazzaholly
redcard_small.gif


redcard_small.gif
Stupid Yanks jeering...21-07-2009
03:18 PMExpired 1Abuse of Other Member(s)Mike

redcard_small.gif
Profile Infraction 27-05-2009
04:23 PMExpired 1persistant abuse of other usersbrianherron
Click to expand...


It's interesting that you missed out a few of your infractions to make the point that it was Brian, Mike and myself victimising you. You appear to have missed these three 'bullies':-

13-08-2009 12:18 PM by Jimbo
21-05-2009 02:45 PM by al
23-01-2009 07:09 PM by raefil

shaky said:
Yourself, Windowlicker, Brianherron to name but three absolutely guaranteed.
Click to expand...

Brian and Mike weren't moderators when your last three infractions were given, so how did they manage to vote to infract?


billymac said:
Shaky, your last infraction was discussed at length by the mods, 6 mods voted to infract you, hardly being singled out or victimised by one or two is it!!!!!!
Click to expand...

And for reference, I actually voted against infracting you on this occasion, but carried out the wishes of the mod team, as is the way.
 
Last edited:
Dai Vader said:
Anyone would think this site was run by Attila and his Huns and not by people who give some spare time to making the site work.

We've got ex-mods slating current mods, wannabe mods doing a passable impression of politicians and even some who think they are on a moral crusade - where will the fun end!

I'm grateful that the guys with the skills to do so give their time to make it run, as with the guys who give their time to keep anything iffy away from a legal standpoint. They must wonder quite why they bother at times! 😱
Click to expand...
Could you elaborate?
 
We8PNE said:
I think you ought to hand the baton over to someone like me. I'd use it to thrash at least a dozen people on here to within an inch of their miserable lives.

They'd soon realise they'd been infracted. 😱
Click to expand...

There is a difference between getting infracted and getting buggered !!😀
 
gazzaholly said:
It's interesting that you missed out a few of your infractions to make the point that it was Brian, Mike and myself victimising you. You appear to have missed these three 'bullies':-

13-08-2009 12:18 PM by Jimbo
21-05-2009 02:45 PM by al
23-01-2009 07:09 PM by raefil



Brian and Mike weren't moderators when your last three infractions were given, so how did they manage to vote to infract?

They don't need to when you're still there to carry out their wishes! 🙄



And for reference, I actually voted against infracting you on this occasion, but carried out the wishes of the mod team, as is the way.
Click to expand...

It only shows the most recent infractions on my profile, it's you that is being selective. The only one missing is one from Jimbo marked "private". However, Jimbo is always objective and fair, unlike your little vindictive clique you had going.

Jimbo and Suggsy have never been anything but fair, and I suspect the forum would collapse without them, so I have no qualms about them being automatic choices because they don't act like power crazed wankers.
 
The MODs are fine as they are and I'm saying this with two infractions due to what I consider to be 'justified' attacks on Yoga following some of the sick bile he has put on here.

The only thing I ask is the recent 'tactic' of splitting threads (ie between the thread topic and members abusing each other) is continued and used more often.

A recent and interesting thread about Ricky Heppolette was instantly turned into a battleground due to some idiot chav of a new poster winding everyone. A MOD was online, contributing to the thread, but despite requests didn't perform a split so in the middle of a decent thread about a PNE player we've got bad language and people exchanging insults.

Also MODs could be a bit more strict on certain posters turning threads into stories about themselves.
 
AndySaville said:
A recent and interesting thread about Ricky Heppolette was instantly turned into a battleground due to some idiot chav of a new poster winding everyone. A MOD was online, contributing to the thread, but despite requests didn't perform a split so in the middle of a decent thread about a PNE player we've got bad language and people exchanging insults.

Also MODs could be a bit more strict on certain posters turning threads into stories about themselves.
Click to expand...

Re: Ricky Heppolette thread AS, I posted but then re-read through the whole thread and deleted the posts that were "inappropriate", which was frankly about 50% of the thread. I personally feel that splitting a thread is good if there is good discussion that has just gone o/topic, but if it's a battleground thread then these should just be deleted altogether from the board, we've had enough trouble recently with threats/allegations to last us all year!

The last bit, I'm guessing you're on about Yoga. He has his "own" thread, and we have the ignore facility for a reason. Many posters use this facility.
 
bayside said:
, and we have the ignore facility for a reason. Many posters use this facility.
Click to expand...

And there is also one major flaw in that you can't ignore them completely as they get quoted so it makes the whole ignore facility pointless.
 
Back
Top