Naughty, naughty, very naughty .
Teresa May bobbins out .... yes yes yes :thumbsup:
Naughty, naughty, very naughty .
Well if we do sign him, the song writes itself...
Eisa good, Eisa good, Mohammed Eisa Good....
Well if we do sign him, the song writes itself...
Eisa good, Eisa good, Mohammed Eisa Good....
Is he a target man type that we're supposedly after to complement our current striking options ?
I mentioned him like a month ago wanting us to buy him for his goalscoring record. He's tall, holds the ball up well, pacey, get hid head on a lot of balls, great dribbler, skillful and young so matches our tranfer policy...had a great goalscoring record wherever he's been. He's not a target man by any stretch due to his other qualities but can get his head onto balls
He seems just what we want
Peterbough bid over a million turned down.
https://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk...he-chance-to-leave-the-abax-stadium-1-8563882
We are going to have to up our game if we want a decent striker,
Peterbough bid over a million turned down.
https://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk...he-chance-to-leave-the-abax-stadium-1-8563882
We are going to have to up our game if we want a decent striker,
Peterbough bid over a million turned down.
https://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk...he-chance-to-leave-the-abax-stadium-1-8563882
We are going to have to up our game if we want a decent striker,
Do you want us to sign a league two striker or an experienced championship striker?
People keep saying TH won't spend on a experianced striker so I would rather sign this lad than send a load of money on Moore at Barnsley & if you class him as experianced he failed.
This lad has a touch of fuller about him. I want us to get the best TH will let us have.
But if peterbough think he is a good sticker & with there record he will do for me. But can we compete ?
I'm pretty certain that the issue for signings is not with the transfer fee, but with the wages. As soon as we break our transfer record, the player being bought will view their value to the club on a similar basis. As we seem to have a limit on what we pay players in terms of wages, we would then be in a difficult position. Either having to pay someone above what the others get paid or having to do that and also up the wages of some (or many) of our current squad.The ting is here at moment we are in a position to break our Transfer record if we want. We have approx 12 mill from sales. We have never been in this position so if we want this lad we should pay if we are sure he will do well.
I'm pretty certain that the issue for signings is not with the transfer fee, but with the wages. As soon as we break our transfer record, the player being bought will view their value to the club on a similar basis. As we seem to have a limit on what we pay players in terms of wages, we would then be in a difficult position. Either having to pay someone above what the others get paid or having to do that and also up the wages of some (or many) of our current squad.
When you think that the difference between paying someone £10k per week and £20K a week amounts to £520K per annum typically on a 3 year deal, then having to pay that sort of difference would be the equivalent of getting someone on a free transfer as opposed to paying our club record for them.
I don't understand why people just think about the transfer fee. It is the cost of the total deal including wages, bonuses and agents fees that the club have to look at.
If we cant compete with Peterborough we might as well pack up & go home now 😀
I wasn't talking about the Cheltenham lad, more about the relationship between our transfer record, budget and wages. But if we do sign a player for say £2M, wherever we get him from, don't expect him not to ask for big wagesHe's playing for Cheltenham, if he starts asking for wages of 10k then he's going to be staying at Celtenham.
Peterbough bid over a million turned down.
https://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk...he-chance-to-leave-the-abax-stadium-1-8563882
We are going to have to up our game if we want a decent striker,