Skip to main content

CONFIRMED Retained List

  • Thread starter Thread starter JK
  • Start date Start date

CONFIRMED Retained List

Stanley have a replacement in Rich Baghuelou an Australian 6ft 4in defender who might turn out better than ex Rovers youth Sykes.
When we played Stanley in a pre season match my friend approached John Coleman after the match in the bar to ask about the rumours linking us with Dion Charles.
2 million wouldn’t buy him, quipped Coley, and I’d be one of them ! Seriously though, he added, I’d swap him any day of the week for Sean Maguire.
 
I suspect there is another 'transfer list' in that the club would be happy to get them off the wage bill for a nominal fee, free transfer or a season long loan.

That for me would be O'Reilly, Earl & Maguire as I really can't see any of them being involved much at all next season if they stick around. All three really should want to be playing first team football also.

Maybe its a case of those 3 not deserving to be publicly named on the transfer list as they've always given 100%, were as the other three for me haven't. Hopefully we can ship them out easily but its probably going to cost us to do so, particularly in Harrops case.
 
Alpine White said:
We will listen to the right offer for anyone. "Listen to offers" list means we'll accept tuppence ha'penny
Click to expand...

Of course but if we're actively looking to move someone on like Olosunde they should be on that list.

I doubt Maguire will be going anywhere.
 
Regardless said:
raef surely means there is a lot of hatred for the fact that he's retained as a PNE player... rather than hatred of the individual as a person. I think almost everyone likes him as a character... but the anti-Maguire posts are, generally speaking, way way over the top... to the point of being embarrassing imo.
Click to expand...

There are only 2 embarrassing issues with regard to Maguire:

It is embarrassing that PNE are still carrying a striker that has 1 goal from open play in over 100 appearances.

It is embarrassing that PNE have fans that think said striker should still be involved in the squad despite the above stat
 
Mr Meeseeks said:
Very harsh for me that. Granted he’s been off form a bit since his injury, still has a huge part to play here.
Click to expand...

That's only because the Riddler jumped the gun and offered him a contract extension before we had given ourselves to assess how his injury would affect him over the season. At the time I thought that we should have waited until the summer.If we had I would have released him.
 
MyAxe said:
Error laden, injury prone and inconsistent.

Does have the odd good game, but we need better if we are to challenge for the playoffs.
Click to expand...

I get what you're saying, but an upgrade would cost serious money.

In my view he bats at the championship average, little inconsistent, but we'd be selling ourselves into serious trouble if we got rid of him
 
Meldrew's Ghost said:
If we intend to keep both Maguire and Evans in the squad then we could well be in the mire next season. We can't afford to have strikers who can't strike. A genuinely ruthless pruning would have transfer listed both of them.
Click to expand...
Whilst I agree, plenty on here wanted Evans starting with Archer every week just a couple of months ago. His lack of goals was supposedly not an issue back then. There was a double standards approach to Evans and Maguire.
 
Dreyfuss said:
Whilst I agree, plenty on here wanted Evans starting with Archer every week just a couple of months ago. His lack of goals was supposedly not an issue back then. There was a double standards approach to Evans and Maguire.
Click to expand...
For some reason, they preferred Evans running into people and giving away free kicks, to Maguire running into people and winning free kicks. 🤷‍♂️ #allroundplay
 
Back
Top