1. Has the signing of Sinclair killed the team spirit. As our performances have been heading down hill since.
2. Sinclair or Dolan discuss
2. Sinclair or Dolan discuss
Sinclair conundrum
StevieNorthEnd
Safe Hands Cha
Too scorer, wants to go forward, not being played to his strengths.
Better with than without.
Better with than without.
Awful thread
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2019
- Messages
- 53,934
He’s scored 5 goals from the wing! He hasn’t been played centrally for us
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2005
- Messages
- 1,935
What utter rubbish he our leading goal scorer he is our most talented attacking midfield player blame him for our demise!!!! Your deluded
He is like most of our players bound by AN's boring negative tactics!
Put the Blame were Blame is due.
Just look at the New center forward
First few games and he is a revelation
but not at home stook up front on his own
Not even scraps to feed off
I supose you will say he is at fault too
I bet both Him Sinckair and most of our players are fed up playing under AN
He is like most of our players bound by AN's boring negative tactics!
Put the Blame were Blame is due.
Just look at the New center forward
First few games and he is a revelation
but not at home stook up front on his own
Not even scraps to feed off
I supose you will say he is at fault too
I bet both Him Sinckair and most of our players are fed up playing under AN
🤣🤣🤣
Yep, Sinclair is the problem.
Ffs.
Yep, Sinclair is the problem.
Ffs.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2004
- Messages
- 9,002
Sinclair is a flair player AN wants to turn him into a full back, eventually.
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2019
- Messages
- 9,574
What do you mean "Sinclair or Dolan discuss"? Are you asking us to debate whether Dolan is better than Sinclair, that we should have kept him and not signed Sinc?
Unfortunately that’s all you can do when your fullbacks aren’t good enough and you’re not given the cash to buy decent ones.
All wide attackers are expected to do defensive duties these days. It isnt exclusive to our club.
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 4,760
He has played more central in previous games, whether that's intentionally or not.
When he is more central and actually in and around the box, he looks sharp, clever and dangerous.
When he is stuck out on the wing, I find him much less effective. Whether that's down to our disturbingly dull tactics or him I don't know.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2019
- Messages
- 53,934
My concern was more the fact this appeared to be their first worry. Rather than challenging for loose balls they started jogging back before Rovers had even picked up the ball. That’s worrying
Sinclair is a quality player - he is here to ghost in and finish. If you don't let him drift inside and do that what can you do. But for that to happen we need attacking full backs - we have one which the manager trusts in Fisher. He doesn't play Earl whereas Rafu and Hughes are defensive left backs leaving the left winger out wide unable to drift inwards? So what is Neil to do if he cannot sign what he desperately needs at full back?
Remember the excitement at Ewood when Sinclair was about to come on, in contrast to last night.
In my opinion that why there needs to be a change sooner rather than later.
OP
There is a large % of the wage budget being paid to a player that was completely ineffective last night and has been in the majority of the games he has started in. He seems to have been recruited on reputation rather than performance. He will not improve going forward.
The club couldn’t find a comparatively small contact for a young player who may well or not develop into a handy one at this level. He came on and was effective like it or not.
There are strange troubling decisions being made throughout the club.
OP
Do you think he has improved the team? Really!
How many times has he been substituted early to try and build up some more attacking intent