That is wrong on so many levels, that there should be a separate infraction table for it.
Stupid infractions
That is wrong on so many levels, that there should be a separate infraction table for it.
you're piss poor at it. Why haven't you started an fucking Irvine out thread.
OP
shaky
The Gentry (RIP)
Getting infractions is a piece of piss, you upset some wanker callled Whiteinwales and his dad, who change their usernames and become mods,they then team up with wierdo loners who surf the internet all night and sleep all day and a senile old goat who have also crossed swords with Shaky and thrown their toys out of the pram, and then conduct a vendetta, throwing out infractions at every opportunity. They can go quiet for a while, but criticise this old regime like I did recently, and they will go trawling through your posts, find one they think they can ban you for from about a fortnight ago and use that, even though the real issue is letting you know they are still here and have the "power" to ban you purely on their say so, even though the post merely stated that Yoga will be on his own at Xmas while the rest of us are enjoying a happy family Xmas, and with his record of defending paedos at every opportunity and spends the entire year begging enough money to visit Bankok as often as he can (WHY???? 🙄) I suggested there is only one thing he is interested in watching kids open.
Bingo, an infraction.
Fuck off mods.
Bingo, an infraction.
Fuck off mods.
OP
shaky
The Gentry (RIP)
Just to further highlight the hypocricy of the main culprit in this, he is one of the biggest culprits for abusing the tramp as well, to the extent of frequently abusing him in his signature an as is currently the case, his avatar.
If somebody wants to defend paedophiles as Yoga does all the time, and Yoga yesterday said in a post he would suggest "Gary Glitters greatest hits" as an Xmas present for one of the forums most vehement critics of paedos, you have to question why they go to Bankok, which we all know is the child sex capital of the world, as often as they can, especially when they don't have two halfpennies to scratch their arse with.
Now my comments weren't vicious, they were humorous and witty, take a fucking look at yourselves you useless, vindictive arseholes. 😡
If somebody wants to defend paedophiles as Yoga does all the time, and Yoga yesterday said in a post he would suggest "Gary Glitters greatest hits" as an Xmas present for one of the forums most vehement critics of paedos, you have to question why they go to Bankok, which we all know is the child sex capital of the world, as often as they can, especially when they don't have two halfpennies to scratch their arse with.
Now my comments weren't vicious, they were humorous and witty, take a fucking look at yourselves you useless, vindictive arseholes. 😡
MOSSYPNE
Advisor to the owner.
It would seem to me that your a marked man Shaky, I've called Pedo sorry, Yoga, all the things you have (and on the same threads) and even some times worse things and I've had fuck all in the way of an Infraction.
So I'm with you on this one.
Fuck off Mods.
OP
shaky
The Gentry (RIP)
I noticed with some discomfort that this mod with an axe to grind was immune from the voting last time as well, I'm sure when the new elections come up, this will be addressed in the interest of fair play.
It seems once again we have mods who seem to think they can do what they fucking want, the next bout of elections need to be sooner rather than later by the looks of things.
Show some humility and remove those last two ridiculous infractions you have doled out, you cannot possibly justify them.
It seems once again we have mods who seem to think they can do what they fucking want, the next bout of elections need to be sooner rather than later by the looks of things.
Show some humility and remove those last two ridiculous infractions you have doled out, you cannot possibly justify them.
Last edited:
P
PTID
Oh Diddums. Which ex mods are you referring to? Wattie, Horse and Mike haven't been on this forum for weeks, brianherron is away cruising in the Caribbean so who does that leave? PTID, surely not.
Grow up and start taking your deserved punishment like a man.
P
PTID
No, do you?
P
PTID
Let's say I am as sure as your mate is when he says ex mods are influencing the workings of the current admin and mod team.
P
PTID
So you know their alter egos and when they have/haven't logged in over the past few weeks then. 😕
On behalf of the moderation team, I would just like to clarify a few things.
It has been noted that both myself and Shabbagaz were given the roles of senior moderators by the admin team at the last elections and were not elected.
The admin team decided that the old system, where all moderators could issue infractions, caused a lot of trouble, with many people believing that certain moderators had it in for them. The fact that it was very difficult for anybody to honestly say whether this true or not meant that there was a lot of bad feeling as I'm sure many of you remember.
As a result of this, the new system was set up with only myself and shabbagaz (and admin) able to issue infractions. The aim of this was to stop any one moderator victimising posters with which they have an agenda (not that it happened), and infractions were only given out after thorough discussion and a majority verdict had been reached.
The current system of moderation is as follows:-
I hope this clarifies the situation a little.
Hoping all forum members have a happy Christmas.
It has been noted that both myself and Shabbagaz were given the roles of senior moderators by the admin team at the last elections and were not elected.
The admin team decided that the old system, where all moderators could issue infractions, caused a lot of trouble, with many people believing that certain moderators had it in for them. The fact that it was very difficult for anybody to honestly say whether this true or not meant that there was a lot of bad feeling as I'm sure many of you remember.
As a result of this, the new system was set up with only myself and shabbagaz (and admin) able to issue infractions. The aim of this was to stop any one moderator victimising posters with which they have an agenda (not that it happened), and infractions were only given out after thorough discussion and a majority verdict had been reached.
The current system of moderation is as follows:-
- A post is reported (either by forum members or moderators)
- Moderators discuss the reported post and a poll is conducted to decide the action (if any) that should be taken.
- The majority action is carried out by an online moderator.
- However, if the majority verdit is an infraction, then shabbagaz or myself issue the infraction.
I hope this clarifies the situation a little.
Hoping all forum members have a happy Christmas.
Last edited:
Read into it what you will but I will ask you, does your friend have any evidence, no matter how slight, that can prove his accusation that ex mods are influencing current admin and/or moderators. I would guess he hasn't and that being the case it would answer your question wouldn't it?
P
PTID
I don't know, as him.
I was just asking you how you know for sure those ex mods had not been online.
OP
shaky
The Gentry (RIP)
So says Brianherrons son, who had a childish tantrum because Daddy was criticised over his modding last week.
Wattie and Horse were excellent mods, Mike was the worst ever. Your dad was easily led by Mike and Gazzaholly and one or two others, they had a little clique going, and thought they were untouchable, they were wrong.
Your dad, being a coward, resigned before he could be voted off.