dirk pnemouse
The Gentry (RIP)
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2006
- Messages
- 26,968
Who would you have brought on?
Beardsley?
no need for the 3rd substitution we were well on top , 3rd should have been stuckman but it was wasted by tinkering again .
Who would you have brought on?
Beardsley?
no need for the 3rd substitution we were well on top , 3rd should have been stuckman but it was wasted by tinkering again .
Did he have an injury that stops him catching the ball and closing his legs - or could it be he's just not very good and only half the keeper that Stuckmann is?
Beavon was injured
So would you leave him limping around up there possibly doing more damage?
He looked ok to me
He meant beavon was injured.
I see your blind faith is still going strong.
We're fucking shit, get a grip! Haven't you got autographs to collect, anyway?
On your bike mate, the first we didn't battle enough (like the majority of the game), the second simmo wasn't injured but just a disgrace of a keeper and as a man and the third was completely the fault of that useless prat in goal again and was never offside! No passion in the midfield has cost us for weeks now!
Well he couldn't could he? We'd used 3 subs by then.
Jesus, some people really are dumb, or pissed.
You need to be pissed to watch this rabble these days..
He looked ok to me
He pointed at his leg as he went off, I am sure he did.
Simonsen lost that game. He was absolutely wank throughout and the injury was a red herring. That was the worst goalkeeping performance i can remember for years.
Otherwise we played well without creating too much.
What cost us was some bad goalkeeping and a defensive sub that let Coventry get into the game for the only time in the second half.
King was the wrong side of his man for the header in for the first goal and played them on-side for the second.
king a good user of the ball but I am afraid he is painfully slow!