cpnend;n3406673 said:Don't Ireland or FIFA pay the wages of injured players?
Aye they should do. I imagine that is why we have come out in public and criticised ROI over Robbo.
cpnend;n3406673 said:Don't Ireland or FIFA pay the wages of injured players?
kbd_pne;n3406657 said:We won’t be signing Moore, I’m pretty sure of that.
He was deemed too expensive by TH in June / July. His price only went up as the summer went on, with several other, bigger clubs enquiring. It’s probably stayed that way as well given his importance to Barnsley and their promotion push.
I fully expect that we’ve moved on and will have other target men on the list.
kbd_pne;n3405173 said:The most bizarre thing with Blackburn is they didn’t have a recognised, out and out striker starting yesterday but had a £7m striker on the bench in Brereton.
PNEinGranby;n3406734 said:Brereton isn't really a striker. In fact having watched him plenty at Forest it's not really clear what he is. The Arsenal game for them apart, I can't remember him having a good game. The Forest fans were amazed at the money they got for him.
Many Clouds;n3406755 said:So 2 suggestions so far are Tom Eaves and going back in for Kieffer Moore... they're 2 players i'd love for us to go in for, but surely Gillingham/Barnsley will want over 1-2 million for either player? I highly doubt that sort of money will get sanctioned by Hemmings. Bargain bucket it is again me'thinks!
PNEinGranby;n3406734 said:Brereton isn't really a striker. In fact having watched him plenty at Forest it's not really clear what he is. The Arsenal game for them apart, I can't remember him having a good game. The Forest fans were amazed at the money they got for him.
Mickypne;n3406751 said:I watched that Arsenal game and thought he was class then was staggered he hardly lade their Championship team.
Many Clouds;n3406755 said:So 2 suggestions so far are Tom Eaves and going back in for Kieffer Moore... they're 2 players i'd love for us to go in for, but surely Gillingham/Barnsley will want over 1-2 million for either player? I highly doubt that sort of money will get sanctioned by Hemmings. Bargain bucket it is again me'thinks!
sedgwick__7;n3406764 said:Eaves has just 6 months left on his contract, so adding that to his lack of pedigree about League 1 level, I don't think he'd be very expensive. He looks to be a huge physical presence and a big goal threat in that division, whether he could transfer that goal threat to Championship level and provide the mobility and running we need is another matter. One of the plus points of Moore (although seemingly off the table now) was that despite his height and big frame he runs all day for the team. I haven't seen much of Eaves but I wonder if he's got the pace required. If he does then I'm sure he's one Neil and Ridsdale will be looking at.
sf;n3406766 said:To be fair, if we sign a big targetman, I couldn't see them being a regular starter, just an option to change games or something different if we're playing a soft defence like Brentford or Bristol City.
Mobility would be good but you pay a big premium for that, I wouldn't be against a disruptive Dichio type coming in, as we already have a pacey option in Nmecha and a poacher in Moult.
Lets face it, we're not going to sign someone who is the complete package and if we do, it'll be someone who needs 12 months to adapt.
sedgwick__7;n3406770 said:I just view mobility at the top end of the pitch as pretty vital to our system really. They don't have to be rapid but have to press for most of the game. Hugill was certainly capable of this.
We all had this debate on here towards the start of the summer when discussing the potential arrival of a target man, wondering how much one would be used and etc. Neil played a target man every week at Norwich in Jerome, and every week here when Hugill was still here. I think he's views a target man as a vital option who would play a lot of games, not just someone to come on for the last 20 minutes.
We do have 'options' but Nmecha is yet to score and looks very raw (and only on loan), and Moult is yet to score when starting a game and has struggled at times to lead the line. Although that aspect of his game has improved a bit since he's arrived, I still think he looks far more effective off the bench when there is more space and another, more physical forward has already 'roughed up' the defenders.
I agree about development and 'the complete package'. Pretty much most of the signings we've made since Grayson left have been for the future or players who'll need integrating. Obviously it could be good for the future but the first team has not really improved as a result, which is probably part of the reason why we currently lie in the bottom half.
sf;n3406774 said:Agree with what you're saying but i've just lowered my expectations completely, mobility is key to Neil's system but I just can't see us signing someone who has a good scoring record, is good in the air and has good mobility.
As has been mentioned, Moore looked perfect, now we're working our way down the list.
sf;n3406776 said:Was our interest in Karlan Ahearne-Grant much more than a rumour? Having a great season.
Mr.T;n3406780 said:We are after that Sam Gallagher again who was at Rovers on loan.
Mickypne;n3406787 said:Not discreditting you personally but i can't see this. I'm sure Birmingham had to pay 2 million to loan him for the season. Sod that, i'd rather bang in 2 million on Moore permanently.
LostinYorkshire;n3406788 said:Given that Ridsdale said 'a club' had accepted a PNE record offer (Healy £1.5million) for a striker but they doubled the asking price overnight (£3million +), I expect 'that club' will want significantly more than £2milion for Moore now.