So just for Mr. Thicky here, how can a club cancel a players contract when they.....have a contract?
Fleetwood obviously want him ( and now have him) so why couldn't North End get a fee for him, albeit a nominal one?
By mutual agreement.
So just for Mr. Thicky here, how can a club cancel a players contract when they.....have a contract?
Fleetwood obviously want him ( and now have him) so why couldn't North End get a fee for him, albeit a nominal one?
You can just mutually agreed something is cancelled. I’m surprised though that there wasn’t zero signing on fee and some sort of sell on fee incase he turns goodSo just for Mr. Thicky here, how can a club cancel a players contract when they.....have a contract?
Fleetwood obviously want him ( and now have him) so why couldn't North End get a fee for him, albeit a nominal one?
OK, so if PNE wanted rid and he had another club wanting to buy him, why no fee?By mutual agreement.
Starting to think that’s the strategy. Zero passengers, limited cover, robust players occupying most of the budget.If this is a gamble tho where we’ve got rid of a whole squad to focus on a strong starting 11 on shit or bust then this could be interesting
By mutual agreement. A transfer would have probably cost Josh a large sum as his wages on his final year here would be significantly higher than anything Fleetwood could pay. Paying up his contract allows him to lessen that blow and for us to get him moved on.So just for Mr. Thicky here, how can a club cancel a players contract when they.....have a contract?
Fleetwood obviously want him ( and now have him) so why couldn't North End get a fee for him, albeit a nominal one?
I could be wrong but pretty sure you can't insert any clauses or sell on fees as we have terminated his contract.You can just mutually agreed something is cancelled. I’m surprised though that there wasn’t zero signing on fee and some sort of sell on fee incase he turns good
I get it. Hadn't realised his contract was paid up. 👍By mutual agreement. A transfer would have probably cost Josh a large sum as his wages on his final year here would be significantly higher than anything Fleetwood could pay. Paying up his contract allows him to lessen that blow and for us to get him moved on.
OK, so if PNE wanted rid and he had another club wanting to buy him, why no fee?
Doubt it...he's due his wages from us for remainder of his contract if he hasn't put in a transfer requestAll credit to Earl for taking a pay cut because he wants to play football and the club for not hanging on for any sort of fee.
Good answer!Oh you will get used to it - most people do in the end.
His contract has been terminated by mutual consent, I take that as he’s due nothing else.Doubt it...he's due his wages from us for remainder of his contract if he hasn't put in a transfer request
Of course. But we could have done a transfer and paid him a one-off leaving bonus I’m sure.I could be wrong but pretty sure you can't insert any clauses or sell on fees as we have terminated his contract.
The "mutual consent" part means Earl will have asked, and the club will have agreed, that Earl isn't out of pocket for terminating the contract, compared to what he was due to get from the contract.His contract has been terminated by mutual consent, I take that as he’s due nothing else.
How? That would involve Earl losing a shit load of money on his existing deal here unless Fleetwood paid him a massive signing on fee (which they won't have the funds to do). This is why we would have paid him up.Of course. But we could have done a transfer and paid him a one-off leaving bonus I’m sure.
Or perhaps Fleetwood are paying Josh a signing on fee equivalent to the loss in wages?By mutual agreement. A transfer would have probably cost Josh a large sum as his wages on his final year here would be significantly higher than anything Fleetwood could pay. Paying up his contract allows him to lessen that blow and for us to get him moved on.