Totally agree Bill please pass this priceless info onto WIBG then we can end this shit
I'm a clever bloke, but I'm lost on this one cha.
Care to expand?
Totally agree Bill please pass this priceless info onto WIBG then we can end this shit
I'm a clever bloke, but I'm lost on this one cha.
Care to expand?
you are The Voice
I remember a time when explosions like the one on the Gentry Day thread were happening several times a week. Shaky (RIP) was at the heart of a lot of it, along with Voldemort, the vicar, VB, Surf and various others... It was entertaining. Some great threads were knocking about because people took each other on. Let's be honest, Shaky wouldn't leave a poster be if he took issue with them, be it fans of lead boots, or indeed Nappy... Not always right, but consistent and open.
I also remember thst Shaky used to get grief for having the name 'Shaky' (and the reason for the name) from one particular poster, it was shamefully wrong. It's a shame that examples of that same kind of abuse has been levelled at a member who has been open and honest about mental health problems. It has happened numerous times, but I suppose it's a perceived weakness that the protagonist has wanted to push to try and get the 'job done' result.
It's wrong.
I remember a time when explosions like the one on the Gentry Day thread were happening several times a week. Shaky (RIP) was at the heart of a lot of it, along with Voldemort, the vicar, VB, Surf and various others... It was entertaining. Some great threads were knocking about because people took each other on. Let's be honest, Shaky wouldn't leave a poster be if he took issue with them, be it fans of lead boots, or indeed Nappy... Not always right, but consistent and open.
I also remember thst Shaky used to get grief for having the name 'Shaky' (and the reason for the name) from one particular poster, it was shamefully wrong. It's a shame that examples of that same kind of abuse has been levelled at a member who has been open and honest about mental health problems. It has happened numerous times, but I suppose it's a perceived weakness that the protagonist has wanted to push to try and get the 'job done' result.
It's wrong.
However, it's not a shame that this poster has 'left' the forum.
Are you saying in the first paragraph that the behaviour is entertaining but in the second it's wrong? Sorry, may be misreading but that's how it read about the same kind of abuse.
Your right Jake... It's misleading... The 2nd paragraph refers to it being taken a personal level. It's not clear.
When the abuse gets personal on a web based forum, you are over stepping the line. And in my opinion, when someone uses an issue like mental health as a 'weapon'... Well, its shamefully wrong.
No worries, the tone didn't match hence my confusion as I didn't think that's what you meant. Sorry didn't mean to detract from your point
It`s also a shame that the forum was not more tolerant of a user, patron, and volunteer forum moderator that was clearly the only person really distressed.
As for how much tolerance do you show? I'm not sure, I mean I don't recall much tolerance been shown towards Hans when he posted on here, do you?
There were similarities. I`d not advise opening that can of worms. It would not go well.
I've no intention of doing that, just merely highlighting the 'when it suits' attitude from some people on this forum.
It`s also a shame that the forum was not more tolerant of a user, patron, and volunteer forum moderator that was clearly the only person really distressed.
What I don't understand is the double standards - if some people complain about abuse, they are told to 'join a forum for women' or man up.
As you have just demonstrated, so comprehensively.
You've lost me.
Doesn`t matter. Some of us were following it.
You've lost me.