I think she will have told P & C "Get your man to make it work."
In that case, we're all totally screwed.
Except her of course 😉
I think she will have told P & C "Get your man to make it work."
In that case, we're all totally screwed.
Except her of course 😉
It will be a consensus to get the club through the next couple of weeks and limit the damage.I don't think that the decision of whether or not to sack the manager is in the hands of Peter and Craig.
It would have significant, unbudgeted costs, and as such will be in the hands of someone who has no love for the club. I think she will have told P & C "Get your man to make it work."
![]()
Club Statement: A Message From Craig And Peter
In tough times the club management is paid to take tough decisions, not easy decisions.www.pnefc.net
Dreaded for whom?The dreaded "Vote Of Confidence"!
Not sure if you have a similar thing in the US, but 9 times out of 10 the chairman/owner of a club coming out publicly and backing their manager or head coach is followed by that manager leaving a few games later - it's happened enough for the idea of being given "the vote of confidence" is like a kiss of death.Dreaded for whom?
Yeah, we have the same thing and I get it. My post was a bit tongue in cheek. And, given how slowly PNE historically is to get rid of underperforming managers, we are in for a dreadful period as fans until the change is made.Not sure if you have a similar thing in the US, but 9 times out of 10 the chairman/owner of a club coming out publicly and backing their manager or head coach is followed by that manager leaving a few games later - it's happened enough for the idea of being given "the vote of confidence" is like a kiss of death.
Personally, I think it's the worst thing a club could do in this situation. More often than not the fans want the change to happen and this change confirms the club don't intend to, the pressure on the manager is intensified rather than relieved because it's like getting a formal written warning from your boss, the directors put themselves in a position where they may have to perform a U-turn and more of the season is eaten away at with someone in charge who all of the players know probably isn't going to be there for much longer.
Hence why the right thing to do for everyone is to just get him gone.
When Lowe is potted - and it's certainly when, not if - Ridsdale should certainly depart at the same time. We need fresh, modern ideas.
We have no club identity on or off the pitch, because it's all based around doing the bare minimum. There's no long term strategy at all.
The football has been complete dross for 4+ years under three different managers. Yet we continue to renew contracts of players who don't deserve them.
Results matter but performances do too. The current brand of football is unwatchable drivel that will never get a championship team promoted.
We need to sweep away the depressing mindset that our clubs ambition starts and ends at achieving a midtable finish.
We need to stop rewarding mediocrity.
We all know Lowe isn't going to turn it around & will get sacked.
They just don't want the cost yet.
I think they believe that the anger is limited to social media... the possible toxicity on Tuesday will be on them.
Appearance Money?Woodburn should not be seen in a first team game again. Lowe continue selecting the likes of him will be your undoing . Dreadful choice of player to bring on. I agree
It will be a consensus to get the club through the next couple of weeks and limit the damage.
It's all business decisions.
Was chatting to a chap last night about how when you went to a game you knew what to expect, like David Ayres on the wing, Fuller up front, McKenna mid field with Gregan etc etc ..players performing week after week, knowing their roles....nowadays its just hopeless and seemingly without any plan.
I'm not a mechanic, but I know if my car doesn't start then there is something wrong with it. I'm not an electrician, but I know if the TV doesn't switch on then there is something wrong with it. In both cases I don't need a qualification to be able to state the obvious.Question though JK, in your profession (mental health) if someone came into your office and started telling you how to do your job and telling you what you have done wrong would you at some point question their credentials to backup what they’re saying?
Or am I allowed to come and tell you how to do your job without having the relevant qualifications to back it up?
Because if you get offended by what Lowe said you would say I am allowed to do that.
Let’s just have people without maths GCSE’s telling chartered accountants what to do and being allowed to get offended when it doesn’t add up.