Maybe we should go back to it 🤷🏼‍♂️at times yesterday it was fucking awful.One common denominator in that list. They all played over 30 years ago. Game has changed. How many pairings can you name in football now, or even in the last 5 years?
Confirmed Jusef Erabi | Signs on loan (with option)
They were just about the only Merseyside group not played on the tannoy yesterday.Pretty good to be fair, although the Real Thing aren't my thing.
Beardsley LinekerThomas Brazil
Saville Wilkinson
Bull Mutch
Keegan Toshack
Shearer Sutton
Dalglish Rush
It does work.
Supported by 2 quick wide players with Erabi dropping deeper back to goal.Could see a world where Erabi is the main striker. Back to goal and hold up play looks great and has some pace. Just looks a pain in the arse for defenders all round.
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2008
- Messages
- 13,019
View attachment 36139
Quite like this one someone posted yesterday
The second verse doesn’t scan at all. Whoever wrote that clearly didn’t try to sing it.
Great cameo yesterday.
His highlights YouTube package looked promising regards hold up play.
Physically, he looks strong but it is his speed / pace that excites me of his attributes.
A lovely sneaky goal yesterday.
His highlights YouTube package looked promising regards hold up play.
Physically, he looks strong but it is his speed / pace that excites me of his attributes.
A lovely sneaky goal yesterday.
I guess that Saville / Wilkinson, Fuller / Healy. Macken / Cresswell you never viewed, as just a few examples.Not a fan of playing with two out and out strikers because there’s no link with the midfield
Also leaves us with nothing to bring on
Garner / Beckford then?
Of course we can play with a two.
Don't fall for the pseudo footballing tactical politics.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2021
- Messages
- 6,347
You’ll soon find that pace isn’t a particularly strong attribute for him. He’s a very intense runner, but his top speed is pretty average.Physically, he looks strong but it is his speed / pace that excites me of his attributes.
Then you've been blinded by propaganda.One common denominator in that list. They all played over 30 years ago. Game has changed. How many pairings can you name in football now, or even in the last 5 years?
The only tactic consistent since Day One in the 1880s is the Goalkeeper.
I'm not necessarily agaisnt it, I'm just saying the game has changed and we don't see strike pairings anymore.Then you've been blinded by propaganda.
The only tactic consistent since Day One in the 1880s is the Goalkeeper.
Doesn't make a strike pairing wrong though.I'm not necessarily agaisnt it, I'm just saying the game has changed and we don't see strike pairings anymore.
Trends eventually buck.
Let ourselves buck this negative trend, yeah?
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Messages
- 8,438
CIlla Black, Ken Dodd, and Echo And The Bunnyman were also off the playlist. There was only Keane, I heard, that weren't from Liverpool.They were just about the only Merseyside group not played on the tannoy yesterday.
Any Sonia?CIlla Black, Ken Dodd, and Echo And The Bunnyman were also off the playlist. There was only Keane, I heard, that weren't from Liverpool.
Maybe we should.I'm not necessarily agaisnt it, I'm just saying the game has changed and we don't see strike pairings anymore.
Starting on Saturday.
Even with many of the great forward partnerships, there was almost always one of them who played further forward with the other being more of a support to him - I suppose in modern terminology a 10. Dalglish would float around Rush, Keegan around Toshack, Heath around Gray, Beardsley around Lineker.
Even if that wasn’t the case and that sort of partnership, what’s to say they couldn’t come back? They probably won’t but thinking in football changes constantly otherwise we’d all be playing 2-3-5 still.
Even if that wasn’t the case and that sort of partnership, what’s to say they couldn’t come back? They probably won’t but thinking in football changes constantly otherwise we’d all be playing 2-3-5 still.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Messages
- 8,438
The 1986/87 PNE model of Brazil, floating around JT.Even with many of the great forward partnerships, there was almost always one of them who played further forward with the other being more of a support to him - I suppose in modern terminology a 10. Dalglish would float around Rush, Keegan around Toshack, Heath around Gray, Beardsley around Lineker.
Even if that wasn’t the case and that sort of partnership, what’s to say they couldn’t come back? They probably won’t but thinking in football changes constantly otherwise we’d all be playing 2-3-5 still.
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 6,774
They were just about the only Merseyside group not played on the tannoy yesterday.
Dont know what Keane were doing on there, especially as they missed off the legendary Pete Wylie to complete The Crucial Three. 🙌🏻🤓
"Better the owners you know"?Any Sonia?
Not implying the Hemmings are devils, but was too tempting.
AgreedEven with many of the great forward partnerships, there was almost always one of them who played further forward with the other being more of a support to him - I suppose in modern terminology a 10. Dalglish would float around Rush, Keegan around Toshack, Heath around Gray, Beardsley around Lineker.
Even if that wasn’t the case and that sort of partnership, what’s to say they couldn’t come back? They probably won’t but thinking in football changes constantly otherwise we’d all be playing 2-3-5 still.
In my mind the Nogan/Macken partnership varied things slightly though. I feel like there were a lot of balls in towards the chest of Macken (essentially 10) rather than the head of Nogan (9). The ball would then usually go to the nearest winger. Normally it was about 9 flicking to 10 (old numbers). My memory tells me Moyes liked Macken to bring in the wingers more and then Nogan to be on the end of the crosses.
I do not like the new systems. Watching Manchester City in person was depressing. If they cannot be inspirational with their resource then what hope for the rest?