- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 6,888
Kong let's assume you factor the whole lot of your list in and they all failed which I don't believe Neal, Otsemobor, Baker, Eaton, Mainwearing, Parillon, Ward and Friend would have done but let's for once give you a massive benefit of the doubt. Against the expenditure and losses of the named shame list the gamble on this lot would have been worth it because by comparison the investment would have been marginal.
The problem with you Kong is you've failed to take into account my undeniable outstanding successes whereas my response to you has been much more balanced. In such a manner Kong arguments are won.
As for Mark? He falls on his own sword time after time and loses control which is why he was recently banned. I doubt if he's ever made a boardroom presentation in his life and I suspect it would be a disaster waiting to happen if he ever had to do so. It's time for you chaps to "man up" and accept you have been proven wrong.
The problem with you Kong is you've failed to take into account my undeniable outstanding successes whereas my response to you has been much more balanced. In such a manner Kong arguments are won.
As for Mark? He falls on his own sword time after time and loses control which is why he was recently banned. I doubt if he's ever made a boardroom presentation in his life and I suspect it would be a disaster waiting to happen if he ever had to do so. It's time for you chaps to "man up" and accept you have been proven wrong.